01
Question stacking
Short interaction / early exit
SAVEDREP
SELF-OBSERVATION
I asked where she was from immediately after she answered my first question.
Text-only self-observationWorking alpha · global product research
Record the reps.Fix the pattern.
A post-conversation field debrief for men who do multiple cold approaches in one outing. Compare attempts, spot repeated habits, and carry one clear adjustment into the next rep.
Device-local audioThree reps, one patternNo upload or transcription
SAMPLE OUTING / LOCAL03 SAVED REPS
- REP 01Question stacking
- REP 02Missed thread
- REP 03Question stacking
REPEATED BEHAVIOR02×
SUPPORTEDby 2 self-observations
CAPTURETEXT ONLY
AUDIO UPLOADNONE
OUTPUTONE CUE
Sample field debrief
One night. Three reps. One pattern worth fixing.
Most tools score a single clip. FieldCue is designed around the pattern that repeats across an entire outing.
02
Missed conversational thread
Conversation continued
SAVEDREP
SELF-OBSERVATION
She mentioned a weekend market, but I changed topics instead of reflecting on that detail.
Text-only self-observation03
Question stacking
Contact exchanged
SAVEDREP
SELF-OBSERVATION
I followed her answer with two new questions before sharing an observation of my own.
Text-only self-observation02×
REPEATED PATTERN DETECTED
Question stacking
The same user-selected behavior appears in attempts 01 and 03. FieldCue uses those two evidence sentences and does not infer a hidden cause from the outcomes.
NEXT-REP ADJUSTMENTReflect once before asking again.Carry this cue, not a ten-point checklist.
The working hypothesis
Not another AI line generator.
The market already has real-time prompts, generic conversation scores, and approach counters. The open question is whether serious practitioners want a compact review loop built for repeated field practice.
Outing-level memory
Compare behavior across multiple attempts, not one clip.
Evidence-linked feedback
Every coaching note points to an observable moment.
One transferable cue
Finish with the single adjustment most worth testing next.
Start without email
One answer now. Interview only if you want.
A result count cannot explain what to change. Pick the review problem that happened most recently; the optional note is enough to add context without joining a call.
Recruiting globally
Help decide what gets built.
We are interviewing 15 men who have done at least five cold approaches in the last month. The first decision is whether a useful product needs full conversation audio or whether a 30-second voice recap is more repeatable in the field.
TIME15 min interview
FORMATRemote, English
THANK-YOU5 free debrief test slots
EARLY OFFER$19 founder pack
This is product research, not a finished recording service. The form does not collect conversation audio or information about people you meet. Five qualified interview participants can opt into one free three-rep debrief using their own short recaps.
See the planned $19 human-reviewed offer · no checkout yet →Compare the separate $19 self-serve software offer →Before you join
Quick answers.
Is the product already available?
A narrow working alpha is available now. It records optional post-attempt recaps on the current device and compares three saved attempts. It is still a workflow experiment, not a finished coaching service.
Is this real-time coaching?
No. The concept is post-conversation review. It is meant to help you reflect between attempts or after an outing, not feed you lines through an earbud.
What happens to audio?
The research form collects no audio. FieldCue Alpha keeps its optional voice recaps in browser storage on the current device and does not upload, transcribe, or analyze them.